Skip to main content
Founder / Planning Tool

Accessibility Legal Review Planning

A founder planning page for preparing accessibility wording, status pages, and public statements for qualified legal review.

This is not legal advice

  • ▸This page is not legal advice
  • ▸No attorney has reviewed this page
  • ▸No accessibility legal review has been completed
  • ▸This page does not determine legal obligations
  • ▸This page does not certify WCAG, ADA, Section 508, or any other compliance standard
  • ▸A qualified attorney or accessibility professional should review public-facing statements before launch
This page does not provide legal advice and does not certify any standard. All public-facing accessibility wording should be reviewed by a qualified attorney before launch.

What Should Be Reviewed by Qualified Counsel

Public Accessibility Status wording

/accessibility-status

Plain-language status summary — confirm it does not overclaim or imply certification.

Accessibility Statement draft

/accessibility-statement-planning

Draft language for future public statement — must be reviewed before publishing.

Known limitations language

/known-accessibility-issues

Wording that honestly describes what is not certified or complete.

Instructions page wording — confirm it does not commit to a response timeline.

Privacy-related wording

/accessibility-feedback-planning

Confirm no-collect language covers all required scenarios for the feedback process.

No-certification disclaimers

/accessibility-quick-check

Ensure every relevant page includes clear no-certification language.

Emergency and safety disclaimers

/safety

Confirm all emergency routing language is legally appropriate and not misleading.

Public launch claims

/public-readiness-checklist

Review what the platform says about public readiness — confirm no overclaiming.

Accessibility release notes

/accessibility-release-notes

Confirm documentation language does not constitute a compliance record.

Changelog wording

/accessibility-changelog

Confirm changelog cannot be misread as a compliance or audit record.

What Not to Send Casually

Private user data of any kind

Medical information or diagnoses

Disability status or personal health details

Customer or visitor records

Church or member records

Passwords or account numbers

Private legal, tax, or financial documents

Insurance policy numbers

Government IDs

Questions to Ask a Legal or Professional Reviewer

1

Is this accessibility status wording safe to publish?

2

Are the no-certification disclaimers clear and legally sufficient?

3

Should we avoid using the word 'accessible' in any public-facing context?

4

What feedback collection language is legally safe?

5

What privacy wording is needed before collecting any feedback?

6

What specific wording should be changed before public launch?

7

What claims should we avoid entirely in public content?

8

Does the draft accessibility statement create any implied warranty?

9

Are the known limitations documented in a way that reduces legal risk?

10

Is the emergency/safety disclaimer language appropriate for a web guide platform?

Not Completed Yet

  • No legal review has been completed
  • No professional accessibility audit has been completed
  • No public feedback form with data storage has been implemented
  • No accessibility compliance certification has been obtained
  • No public launch approval has been given

Accessibility Legal Review Planning Checklist

0/12
Confirmed 'not legal advice' warning is visible at top
Confirmed 'no attorney has reviewed this page' is stated
Confirmed 'no accessibility legal review completed' is stated
Confirmed all public-facing content items are listed for review
Confirmed documents-to-prepare section has links to all relevant pages
Confirmed questions-to-ask section covers wording, disclaimers, and safe language
Confirmed What Not to Send casually list is visible
Confirmed Not Completed Yet section lists all 5 honest limitations
No legal advice claim — confirmed
No certification claim — confirmed
No legal compliance claim — confirmed
No professional audit completion claim — confirmed